Energy Regulatory Commission Chair Monalisa Dimalanta –INQUIRER PHOTO/LYN RILLON
MANILA, Philippines — The Office of the Ombudsman on Saturday said investigators had documents needed in the case against Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC) chief Monalisa Dimalanta.
The anti-graft body last August ordered a six-month preventive suspension against Dimalanta for alleged neglect of duty following a complaint by a consumer interest group.
Article continues after this advertisementREAD: Ombudsman suspends ERC chair Dimalanta for 6 months
FEATURED STORIES NEWSINFO Marcos declares Nov. 4 ‘Day of National Mourning’ NEWSINFO LPA seen outside PAR, chance of becoming a typhoon is low NEWSINFO DOJ urged to issue lookout bulletin vs OVP officialsDimalanta filed a motion for reconsideration, but the Ombudsman denied it on October 1, saying there was “sufficient basis” for the suspension order.
READ: Dimalanta to file motion for reconsideration on preventive suspension
Article continues after this advertisementAn October 22 order from the Ombudsman then lifted her suspension.
Article continues after this advertisementThe Ombudsman explained “Dimalanta has already filed her counter-affidavit and the documents needed in the investigation are already in the possession of investigators. What is simply left to be done is the submission of position papers and a clarificatory hearing.”
Article continues after this advertisement“As in the other cases investigated by the Ombudsman, the preventive suspension was lifted prior to the expiration of the six-month period provided by law,” it added.
The Ombudsman also said the order lifting Dimalanta’s suspension was distinct from its prior resolution denying her motion for reconsideration.
Article continues after this advertisementRepublic Act 6770, the law organizing the Office of the Ombudsman, states a preventive suspension order is warranted if evidence of guilt is strong based on the body’s judgment or if any of the three criteria are met:
The charge against such officer or employee involves dishonesty, oppression or grave misconduct or neglect in the performance of duty The charges would warrant removal from office The respondent’s continued stay in the office may prejudice the case filed against himThe law adds that a preventive suspension order may be effective during the period of the investigation but not for more than six months.
The anti-graft body, however, explained “When the reason for the preventive suspension has already been ceased, justice and fair play demands that the preventive suspension should not be for the full six-month period allowed by law but should immediately be lifted.”
The Ombudsman cited Quimbo vs. Gervacio (GR No. 155620), which said “preventive suspension is merely a preventive measure, a preliminary step in an administrative investigation.”
“The purpose of the suspension order is to prevent the accused from using his position and the powers and prerogatives of his office to influence potential witnesses or tamper with records which may be vital in the prosecution of the case against him,” it added.
Malacañang reinstated Dimalanta as ERC Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer in a memorandum on Thursday, October 31.
Subscribe to our daily newsletter
READ: ERC chair Dimalanta reinstated – Palaceowl game
READ NEXT PAF: C-295 landing incident in Batanes under probe December declared PH Architecture Fest – Nat’l Arc... EDITORS' PICK Gov’t aid for typhoon victims reaches P1.1 billion, says NDRRMC Poverty incidence in Central Visayas drops in 2023 Angelica Lopez is ‘Pearl of the Orient Seas’ in Miss International 2024 More than 273,000 passengers seen in ports nationwide on All Souls’ Day PNP-ACG led Manila Pogo hub raid – NCRPO PBA Finals: Momentum now on Ginebra’s side, Chot Reyes admits MOST READ Marcos, BARMM leaders discuss collaboration for 2025 elections LPA seen outside PAR, chance of becoming a typhoon is low DOJ urged to issue lookout bulletin vs OVP officials Marcos declares Nov. 4 ‘Day of National Mourning’ Follow @FMangosingINQ on Twitter --> View comments